Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« May 2005 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
Entries by Topic
All topics «
Charles & Camilla
Federal Politics
From the Library
German Election
Gomery Inquiry
Living Despite Chemistry
Mood Swings
Moral Politics
More Quizzing
Music
My Cat Said
News Items
Provincial Election
Regular programming.
Tales From the Saltmine
The World At Large
The World in Pictures
Thoughtful Fun
What's on TV?
Best Places
Madurodam, Holland
How's the Experiment Going?
Monday, 23 May 2005
Women in German Politics
Topic: German Election
Good morning.

I've just read an entertaining, informative article from Der Speigel concerning Angela Merkel, leader of the Christian Democrat Party. I wish I could tell you the difference between them and the Christian Social Party. What's relevant is that she's a candidate for Chancellor in the upcoming German election.

Here's an excerpt describing an all-candidates meeting:

She is here to add some spunk to this convention. She has brought Peter Mueller with her, the Minister President of the state of Saarland. Mueller speaks first. He walks up to the lectern, and the first thing he does is place a glass of beer on it. "Cheers," he says. His voice sounds croaky. He has won over his audience. Almost before he started.

Here's another:

But there is still no welcoming committee. Alice Schwarzer once wrote that men "wouldn't dream of letting somebody without a prick join their pissing contests." Michael Schindhelm says roughly the same thing, albeit differently. "The Union always argues from a position of superiority. Deep down it does not trust East Germans to represent its system. The Union cares about distinction. Angela Merkel was born in 1954. This means that she is deeply entrenched in the history of the GDR."

Canadian politics is every bit as clannish as the next country's. It is common knowledge that the inhabitants west of Kenora are expendable; candidates from Quebec or Ontario may be viewed as suspect depending on who's looking at them.

Posted by Jetta at 9:16 AM PDT
Updated: Monday, 23 May 2005 9:26 AM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Sunday, 22 May 2005
My Mid-life Crisis Vol. 3 Issue 5
Mood:  vegas lucky
On the playlist:

Moby - We Are All Made of Stars; Beatles - And Your Bird Can Sing; Spin Doctors - Little Miss Can't Be Wrong; Chambers Brothers - Time Has Come Today; Madonna - Ray of Light; Blondie - Heart of Glass (Live in 2005); Harry Nillsson - Everybody's Talkin'; Nanette Workman - The Queen (CanCon); Jackson Browne - Running on Empty; Neil Young - When You Dance (CanCon); Hipsway - The Honeythief; Lulu - To Sir With Love; Seekers - Georgie Girl; Beatles - Hello Goodbye; David Bowie - Sound and Vision; Elton John - Levon; The Clash - Guns of Brixton; The Buoys - Timothy; Arlo Guthrie - City of New Orleans; Simple Minds - Lovesong; Buffalo Springfield - On the Way Home; Beatles - Doctor Robert; Donovan - Atlantis; Eric Clapton - It's in the Way That You Use It; Bruce Cockburn - Wondering Where the Lions Are; Boz Scaggs - Lowdown; Tom Robinson Band - 2-4-6-8 Motorway; Gary Numan - Are Friends Electric?; Beatles - Rain;

I looked up last night's dream in the dream interpretation book and it said I'd get a long-deserved reward. No idea when, though, but it could've been today. Sometimes I awaken the next day after a particularly vivid dream that I've remembered as a real experience and either I feel sad to be here instead of there, or I feel achingly happy to have been there just that once. Sometimes it's both.

Last night in my dreams I was lounging on the floor of a school in front of my locker. I was waiting for my friend, whose locker was next to mine. When I saw her walking towards me she was had the same look on her face as she did in high school when I did something to amuse her. Being on the floor turned out to be a good omen. The book didn't have an entry for "waiting" or seeing somebody look the way Heather did.

Spellbound by the prospect of cleanliness and order, I cleaned out half my kitchen cupboards tonight and was rewarded handsomely by discovering that I no longer have to buy the following items for the next decade: salt, jell-o, sugar cubes, and the following teas: cranberry, Russian, Earl Grey. As somebody who drinks coffee for Canada, it's almost embarrassing to reveal that I have any passion for tea, but there it is. When I finished rearranging and discarding, I won an empty shelf.

For the past month, I can't seem to satisfy my need for order. My parts drawers were seen to: bolts separated from screws, screws divided by type, and the nuts and washers never saw each other again. You can't buy that kind of therapy.

I had an epiphany one day while I read the newspaper and thought about cutting out and filing the article. For fuck's sake, I'm going to die one day, I thought, and it was as though a tremendous burden had been lifted. The sun was shining again. Sadly, I think this is the sort of moment that therapy is meant to assist with.

It's not that I don't have stuff. I have a serious collection of LIFE magazines from the mid-late 1950s, Rolling Stones, books of all description, and LP records whose value will increase and save me from destitution. I have old letters, photographs, concert ticket stubs, school yearbooks and meeting minutes collected for most of my life. Mostly I'm accounted for. I wish I could tell you why.


Posted by Jetta at 11:13 PM PDT
Updated: Sunday, 22 May 2005 11:15 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Going to Bat For Belinda
Topic: Federal Politics
Hi there.

Discovered on Judy Rebick's weblog, here is an excellent piece from the Tyee discussing the reactions to Belinda Stronach's emergence as a Liberal party member.

Posted by Jetta at 12:27 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 5 May 2005
Campbell Interview
Topic: Provincial Election
First, I should apologise for the lack of entries in this blog. Loyal readers deserve more attention.

At the moment, I'm a bit pressed for time but here's some observations on the provincial campaign after having dissected recent interviews with both Premier Campbell and Carole James and viewed the debate between Campbell, James, and Adriane Carr.

Premier Campbell gives the impression of a man about to explode whether or not he's enduring another bad hair day (Note to Premier: only boys under 10 have their hair parted like that.) He seems uncomfortable about explaining actions, whether his own or his party's. Campbell has the unfortunate combination of being tense, defensive, and evasive and he seems unable to improvise when not supplied with scripted answers.

In the May 3rd Vancouver Sun interview by Jeff Lee, Campbell was asked 8 questions and only gave direct answers to 1. The statements in quotation marks refer to my interpretation of Campbells's answer. The question he answered was "What do you hope to achieve during the debate?" and I translated his answer to this: "We want to ruin the lying, ill-equipped NDP."

Fair enough. When asked if the recent problems over party donations would hurt the campaign, Campbell's response was "I don't know and I don't want to discuss it."

Question 3 was about Campbell's reliance on scripted responses during walkabouts and public appearances and his habit of favouring meetings with supporters rather than regular folks. His response began with "The issue for me...", where "issue" means "problem," and observed that [reaching out to campaign workers], people who are obviously committed to his party, is time-consuming, hard work. Who the hell wants to convert more Liberals if showing interest in the ones who exist is so taxing? Granted, there are 79 ridings in BC, but who didn't know that? Campbell finishes by including an ancedote about a former nurse who is evidentally a big Campbell fan. My take on this: "It's a lot of work to win people over so let's stick with the ones we've got."

Question 4 is about pissing people off with terrible decisions and whether that will "come back to haunt [him]".

The word "people" is used frequently in his answer and ascribes different sorts of people. "I think people understood we had to make choices." That'd be all voters? "People said we needed to get our financial house in order." Which people? "Were people upset by those choices?" Meaning those who didn't vote for Campbell. "But I do think people are seeing the benefits of the decisions." Obviously not the folks who didn't like his decisions, so it must be Liberals who see the benefits. Campbell seems largely unrepentant: the "people" who didn't like his decisions can go fly a kite or fuck themselves.

What about opposition? Question 5: "Are you worried that the Greens will have an impact in this election?"

"I think the Greens are effective." So is a slap upside the head. He might as well have said the Greens were nice.

"Do I agree with all their platform?" was a rhetorical question from Campbell designed to soften his image as tyrant. Follow it with "Obviously not" so as not to spook Liberals. Campbell's answer suggests that he thinks the Greens are good people who try hard, have a few decent ideas but don't have much future. "But at least they are trying to engage in a discussion of new ideas for the future of the province means "they'll talk to me" in an excited, Jack Russell terrier way.

Question 6: "You don't believe the NDP have a platform?"

The NDP's crime, according to Campbell, is that they're the same old party with a new face. Peppered with unsubstantiated attacks against NDP policy, Campbell's answer can be reduced to rant.

Question 7: "If the Greens do not elect their leader, does that finish them as a party?"

Not if they haven't established themselves as one. Campbell replied "The Green Party is driven, I think, by ideas and their commitment to their ideas." Thanks to the qualifer "I think", Campbell's comment becomes not only banal but wobbly. Driven by ideas and commitment to them? Well, for christ's sake, isn't that what all parties do? It's an answer similar to #5. The Greens are nice people who don't amount to being more than window dressing.

The final question "And saying that doesn't help you one bit to split the Opposition?" Call this the other shoe falling because Campbell's answer began with "You know what helps me..." I call this a dismissal of the question coupled with a quick advert for the BC Liberals. Campbell would rather stick pins in his eyes than say anything positive about the NDP; the Greens, however, do not pose a threat so Campbell can be seen to be magnanimous towards them. One can hope that his implied approval of the Greens may persuade some of his own to cast their vote for them. Not too many, mind.


Posted by Jetta at 4:09 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Tuesday, 5 April 2005
Loose Lips
Topic: Gomery Inquiry


Like full diapers and broken automobile batteries that release their contents at a moment's notice, the Gomery Inquiry has has experienced a major security breach. Imagine that.


Posted by Jetta at 1:47 PM PDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Monday, 14 March 2005
It Was Sunny
Topic: The World in Pictures



Posted by Jetta at 2:46 PM PST
Post Comment | Permalink
Sunday, 13 March 2005
Business As Usual
Topic: News Items



Posted by Jetta at 11:23 AM PST
Post Comment | Permalink
Friday, 11 March 2005
Full Colour Cancer Supplement
Now Playing: Feature song: REM - Shiny, Happy People
Topic: Living Despite Chemistry
The March 1st edition of the Vancouver Sun included a supplement from the BC Cancer Foundation promoting their new research facility in Vancouver. Oddly, the very tiny title at the top of the pages say "Special Advertising Feature,"as though it was a presentation about lavish new homes.

"Take a few moments to read the stories of courage...touched by cancer." The expression "touched by" almost suggests that cancer could be contracted through having random strangers brushing against you. The gentleness implied refers to the Currier and Ives image of a cancer patient lying in bed, frail and delicate in a darkened room. Maybe they mean it like a chilly draught across your neck.

On page 3, it is reported that "death rates from most common lymphocyte cancer reduced by 50 per cent" so that catches my interest. BC has one of the best treatment facilities in the country and there are better survival rates so you might get to die from something else.

The rest of the Special Advertising Feature talks in glowing detail about research, giving many fine examples of how donations have been used. There's a list of donors. I used to get solicitation letters from the Cancer Foundation which prompted me to send e-mail demanding to know how I got on the Christly list. Receiving an innocent letter asking for money to help cure a wicked disease had triggered a primitive impulse in me. I snapped. I thought the Cancer Foundation should go straight to hell. A nice woman replied and told me that I must be on a subscription list, so thanks very much TV Week. My name's off the list.

In the supplement, there are vivid plans of additional good tidings...bright futures...and despite re-reads I cannot make it sensible in my head. It's a written sensation similar to hearing Charlie Brown's teacher and, irrationally, I am slightly furious that the newspaper I was reading with my breakfast had some fucking cancer article in it.

In 1994, I was 33, busy having a good time, busy being good-looking, clever and ambitious. Then one afternoon I was in an exam room with one of my best friends, two or three oncologists, and quite possibly a nurse, being told that I had Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, a cancer which affects the immune system and cannot be cured unlike its Hodgkin's counterpart. It's because of cell structure. The other shoe dropping was that I have both aggressive, fast growing and indolent, slow growing lymphomas lurking in my system. They reassured me that there was plenty of medication to take care of it, and I was praised for my early detection. After an awkward silence, my response was "Well...how about that," as though, being told of a tragedy on the other side of the world, I felt moved and interested to know more, or that some people I knew in the next block had somebody die and I wanted to bring them a casserole.

I remember the few seconds before the diagnosis was delivered as being some of the sweetest even though I knew the shite was hitting the fan. It's a bit like being in a fast elevator going in either direction with crisp audio and bright lights. I heard a sound sort of like the PNE roller coaster as its brakes are unleashed. The same drill applies to this ride: grip the bar firmly but leave your elbows loose; hope that nobody barfs; try to hold onto both your dignity and your hat.

Imagine that you're about to be diagnosed with a big-ticket health item. Generally you receive the news in a roomful of people: two or three strangers, all medical professionals, one or two loved ones, and you. Everybody wants to know how you feel and it creates an unnerving sensation, a weird sense of obligation in you to come up with a suitable response, and don?t worry about how hollow your voice might sound. You?ll become accustomed to having people ask after you all the time, and on occasion, the answer will even be provided. Nobody?s really listening, but you need to decide how you want to present yourself in this new phase of your life ? AD - After Diagnosis. Here?s a tip: everybody in your world will be looking at you differently and sometimes it?ll be hard keeping up with expectations and fighting stereotypes.

Good Patients and Fighters. To my mind, these are the identities people with illness are refitted with by others. The Good Patient is unconscionably sunny, and slightly preoccupied with their condition, as though they've joined a new club and creep everybody out with enthusiasm. They?re also really trusting. Good Patients strike up conversations during which they sometimes ask what you've got. I thought they grouped patients throughout the week - I'm there on Lymphoma Thursdays as opposed to Melanoma Fridays. Furthermore, it?s impertinent to come out and ask somebody what they?re in for, at least by my proudly draconian standards. To whoever wants to know, remember that strangers asking me questions like that earns you a mental ?Fuck you, pal,? without putting too fine a point on it. Even in correctional institutions, the inmates display more sense than to ask.

Fighters often do more research than Good Patients, have slightly aggressive optimism and go through every procedure under the sun largely because they are higher stage patients with a genuine cause for alarm. Cruelly, some of them have shorter after-diagnosis life spans. Christ knows what you?re meant to do with a 6-month prognosis. In the meantime, they've made radical changes in their lives and hold on tight. I see them, slightly wraith-like, in the waiting room. Some of them have their own file folders with various colour post-its hanging out and big felt pen lettering on the cover. They remind me of refugees.

I don't think I have a category. Here's what I do: I've researched NHL and the drugs and now I'm done. I bitch about how long I have to wait for stuff to happen at the clinic and ask to have my card mailed whenever I can. I always sit in the small waiting room because it makes me think of business class. On my way to appointments, I like somebody to piss me off a little bit in traffic so that I'm less afraid. I don't know what to do with myself a lot of the time, and I talk to my cat more than with other humans. Apart from being crap at making plans before I was diagnosed, now I'm afraid to, or maybe I'm just lazy. I don't remember if I have dreams of things I'd like to do or just rely on To-Do Lists.

I'd known one other person with cancer, a boy I went to junior secondary with. Andrew Norton had had some sort of bone cancer and after childhood operations walked with a cane and didn?t go to gym. We spent many happy hours entertaining each other with Monty Python skits and although I realise just now that I loved Andrew, he was never my boyfriend. That wasn't the point. A couple years after high school, I ran into a woman named Laura Kruk, whom I knew in Grade 10, and she was wearing one of those sad looking headscarves that they try to interest you in when you first come in for chemo. Laura had cancer, and I forget what kind, and when I told her I was sorry, she looked unmoved.

Eleven years later, after 2 doses of harsh chemo (consisting of drugs whose names I can no longer say out loud or even think about without feeling uncomfortable), one cycle of which was accompanied by a dash of radiation, and two of chemo light, featuring fludarabine, I still cannot fathom that this is happening to me although I?ve seen the films. It?s a very subtle disassociation, anything to dull the pain, which isn?t always physical. Note that I haven't included any diagnostic procedures in the Have Done list, so add umpteen x-rays, 3 or 4 MRIs, over 300 blood samples and counting, more than 2 dozen CTs, 2 bone marrow extractions, and 3 open biopsies in a pear tree. Two biopsies were in the same armpit. I think my type is Good Sport.

I have been bald twice. It's not so much my vanity that suffers but more my sense of privacy. Baldness is obviously a fashion statement in some circles; my neighbourhood, Commercial Drive, is an ideal place to be bald as opposed to the Westside of town in which people assume you're having chemo. I wore a bright blue bandana and looked as tough as could be expected. As we are always judged by our ensemble while we're out in the world, we ought to devote some time to our creations. I think I make others in the waiting room slightly nervous - for the most part, they're a slightly older, well-coiffed crowd and I dress like a teenage boy. I prepare for visits to the Cancer Agency by wearing boxer shorts, flannel in winter and cotton in the summer because after being prodded and examined by dozens of strangers I was damned if I would wear inadequate undergarments. My self-preservation had to start with something. During an early examination, some comedian noted that my boxers matched the gown I had on. Work socks are perfect for CT scans and MRIs, but do mind the slippery floor. The piece de resistance is the undershirt; I favour black because, Lord knows, the last thing I want is to look vulnerable, and I don't wear gowns unless forced. That's the deal.

I won't use the expression "my cancer" for the obvious reason that it isn't mine although I have no qualms about saying ?my cold? or ?my bunions,? if I had any. Cancer is like a squatter, neither homeless nor a tenant. I will use the word "cancer" in sentences about me, sometimes with the word "patient" right after it to make a point that has nothing to with self-identity but with classification or description. Ergo, "I am a cancer patient but I'm not one." I don't go to seminars about NHL and the few times I went to a support group, I felt like I had nothing to say and had trouble hearing other people?s stories but it wasn?t from self-centeredness. The words "journey," "challenge", "gift," or "survivor" used with any frequency provokes ill temper in me. Am I like the alcoholic who won't go to AA because it's full of drunks? No, it?s that for me, dealing with cancer, as with all the other shitty things that have happened in my life, is primarily an individual effort. I have a time-honoured tradition of not asking for help until it becomes an emergency although I appear to be improving. I am not a group person and I?m not easy to be close to. Ask any of my ex?s.

Try reading Susan Sontag's Illness as Metaphor to see what it means to be a person with an illness. It upsets and confuses the others if they think you?re not getting enough attention even if you don?t want it. Suddenly your family will want to know all about you because they think you?re dying and they better act fast. One of my oldest friends, an ex-girlfriend, had inexplicably severed our friendship 6 months prior and only acknowledged me in the most perfunctory way in social settings when she couldn't avoid doing so, at least had the decency to keep that up after she heard I had cancer. I applaud her integrity, and I know that she genuinely wished me well. I?ve had a friend offer to pray for me and to put me on a prayer list, and my response was similar to that when I received a birthday present entitling me to have strangers come and clean my apartment. I?m afraid that grace was not the order of the day.

The other day I went in to the vet's, as I tell my cat, and I got one of those nurses who thinks that using a Pretty Doggie voice when speaking to patients will be soothing. The nurse?s job is merely to call your name in the waiting room, escort you to the exam room, weigh you, and make a polite enquiry as to your current state. "Hello-o-o! How are yoUUuu?" she said, and, as my Dad put it, you want to bark at them. I?d like to tell them to fuck off but it really pays to keep the nurses glad to see you. I am pleasant but not encouraging. She asked me about 3 times while folding the nighties, as she called them, how I was until I sighed heavily and mentioned that I?d had to reformat my computer and what a pain in the ass that was. You have to keep reminding medical professionals that your brain is still functioning so look busy. Crossword puzzles done in pen make a good impression. Maybe next time I'll bring in a clipboard and draw elaborate diagrams on graph paper.

So, about that Special Advertising Supplement about Exciting Advances in Cancer Research. Rarely does a week pass when there isn't another announcement. Used to be on Wednesdays that new cures would be unveiled - cheery pieces for the evening news to put people at ease, just a little bit, for one damn day. There. That oughta keep them quiet. What bleak prospects for drug companies should cancer be cured. On a personal level, I want nothing better than to be rid of what's come to afflict me yet I'm afraid to be [insert word like "hopeful", "optimistic"] because I'm afraid there's nothing there. Not a big gambler, me. Sounds like the X-Files, doesn't it? I Want To Believe.

I don?t spend much time pondering how I came to be in this jackpot because I recognised immediately the futility in that, and because it's like being mugged. Whatever hit you is miles away by now. My soul mourns for how I used to feel before I had cancer, for the confidence, the desire, the vision. My soul aches for how I feel now, for what I imagine I could?ve had: opportunities, adventures, perhaps the love of my life so naturally I take time to review every bad decision I've ever made. After I'm done, I can rely on Teutonic genes enabling me to better accomodate these frequent periods of angst in an otherwise only slightly depressed existence and bury the melancholy until next time it oozes out. Lately, I have been reaping the benefits of frequent cannabis use. I?m able to lead a relatively happy life and think Wow! I?m not dead yet and Let's have a snack. Most days are like that but I sometimes feel like the Coyote holding an umbrella as a shield against a falling boulder and then I can?t bear to hear anything about courage.


Posted by Jetta at 12:01 AM PST
Updated: Friday, 11 March 2005 6:12 PM PST
Post Comment | Permalink
Wednesday, 9 March 2005
Sample Playlist
Topic: Music
The genre of music I most like is described as Classic Rock, that is to say, that which was produced in the mid-late 60s through to the early 80s. When I listen to music on my computer, I use Winamp to randomly sort a list of about 200 songs. Here's what I've been listening to this afternoon. Bear in mind that the selection is random, as with lottery tickets.

The Cure - Pictures of You
Nanette Workman - The Queen
Bruce Cockburn - Wondering Where the Lions Are
INXS - New Sensation
Iggy Pop - Lust For Life
Booker T & the MGs - Time is Tight
Jim Croce - I Got a Name
Bryan Adams - Diana
Jesus Jones - Right Here Right Now
Glen Campbell - Witchita Lineman
Valdy - A Good Song
Neil Diamond - Holly Holy
Max Webster - Paradise Skies
Andrea True Connection - More More More
Harry Nilsson - Everybody's Talkin'
The Stampeders - Oh My Lady
Tommy Tutone - 8675309 (Jenny)
Madonna - Ray of Light

Exhibit A reveals that I am willing to listen to kitsch, and suggests that I'm capable of singing in my car. In a recent article somewhere it was posited that most people favour the music of their youth. I own many, many LPs, several of them rescued from Value Village, some (Santana, the Doors, Simon & Garfunkel, Peter & Gordon), donated from my aunt and uncle, and the rest bought. The old turntable's belt had disintegrated after 20 years, necessitating the purchase of an entirely new grammophone from A&B Sound. It was a purchase that I was grateful and a bit astonished to be able to make.

Thanks to technology I can copy analog to digital, not to tidy up the scratches, but to archive the songs. Behind the massive audio/visual shelf is a network of wires and cables that allow me to do these cool things because I haven't a real job to go to. I download a lot of songs from newsgroups and often find obscure titles like "Timothy," by the Buoys. You know what that song was reputedly about, right?

When I was a typesetter at the The Peak I could listen to a walkman and typeset at the same time. The trick was that I didn't actually read the copy, I only looked at the letters and my fingers did the rest, and if I made a mistake I could feel it because what I saw and what I sensed in my fingers didn't match. With this web log, I can compose with music playing and be uninfluenced lyrically by the words but still experience sensory images and write. This is to say, my imagination is unleashed but I'm not copying what I'm hearing. Wow... Although I have a preference for rock, I also enjoy big band jazz (Bix Beiderbecke, Paul Whiteman, Billie Holliday, etc), true classical (Mozart, Sibelius, etc), and some opera although they aren't helpful to my writing. It helps that I love typing; I'm fast and accurate and it turns out that the composition feature of my brain can be shut off or enhanced at will. Have I mentioned the extensive editing?

Chat rooms used to hold quite a draw for me and I'd routinely fire up Winamp before logging on. Gordon Lightfoot, a fine example of a sensitive singer suitable for even the toughest customer, was a good choice for exorcising unhappy karma yet not so much for encouraging intelligent conversation. The temptation to chastise participants for using ill-considered grammar or poor spelling, and brow-beat Americans for lacking sufficient knowledge or interest in the rest of the world just because I could had to be put to rest.

I have no idea whether being able to compose and listen is a common trait; as somebody who regularly compartmentalises aspects of their life it seemed fitting that I would do the same for thought process. Please leave comments about what helps you write.

Posted by Jetta at 4:20 PM PST
Updated: Sunday, 13 March 2005 12:14 PM PST
Post Comment | Permalink
When You Marry Your Mistress...
Now Playing: Classic Rock , as pretty much always
Topic: Charles & Camilla
you create a vacancy.

Here's money well spent and then some more, with a link to the BBC story. You knew that Diana was a couple of inches taller than Charles, right?



Posted by Jetta at 3:59 PM PST
Updated: Wednesday, 9 March 2005 4:06 PM PST
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older